This week Beowulf died. . . again; this
time, perhaps, for the last time. The final tests are sitting on my
desk waiting to be graded, and since I'm retiring from teaching
public high school this spring, this is very likely the last time
I'll be there when the great monster killer draws his final breath.
More than a few of my seniors felt a quiver of relief as Beowulf
expired from an enormous dragon bite to the neck; there's always a
group of students who bore quickly and who live in perpetual hope
that the next unit will be marginally more interesting than whatever
we are studying now. For me, it was a poignant moment, as perhaps it
should be in the presence of any death, let alone that of a great
king; however, my grief this time was not for the mythic hero as he
expired from the scalding, lethal venom that coursed through his
veins, but for myself. This time as Beowulf died, I felt sorry for
myself. Beowulf may be dead, but I'm just getting too old to take
another group of high schoolers back to Geatland.
Not all of my seniors, of course, are
cynical, apathetic, or burned-out, and I remain extremely grateful
that there are still some students who allow themselves to get swept
up in the ancient adventure of this classic literary journey.
Despite the best efforts of political factions who work tirelessly to
wring every bit of joy out of teaching and learning, a core group of
students – who actually like thinking and who don't mind thinking
about difficult material – still persist in the habit of finding
life interesting. It was for them, as much as myself, that I grew
sentimental over the death of Beowulf. Certainly, next year when
I'm gone (and appropriately enough the building I'm teaching in now
becomes a parking lot), the school district will find someone to pass
out the Beowulf books and cover the material. However, it won't be
me, and never again, will I have a chance to share some of the
intriguing insights that I have gained from repeatedly reading and
explaining the text. So, with your indulgence, here are some of the
life lessons I've learned from reading Beowulf. Keep in mind,
however, I am not a medieval scholar; I'm a rhetorician. The aspects
of the text that excite my attention might cause some serious
consternation to some of my friends who really understand the history
of the period and know what they are talking about when discussing
Beowulf. So, Stella and Josie (who are such terrific
medievalists that they do not need to rely upon autocorrect to
spell the word “medievalist”), please forgive any of my 21st
century anachronistic goofiness that may cause you to think I give a
doctorate in English a bad reputation.
Lesson #1: Every problem has a
mother. If I had to choose the greatest life lesson that comes
from studying Beowulf, it's that life is always waiting for
you to think that you have a specific problem completely licked
before it reveals to you that you're not even half finished with it
yet. Anyone who has ever tried to keep a worn-out old car
street-worthy knows exactly what I'm talking about. In the story of
Beowulf, the greatest, strongest, bravest mortal to ever kill
a sea monster (while swimming in full chainmail armor) arrives in
Denmark to help its king, Hrothgar, deal with a real-life bogeyman
who has been showing up at night to cannibalize his soldiers. After
building the greatest drinking hall in history, Hrothgar soon learned
he had to cut the taps off early each evening because if he didn't, a
10 foot Nordic hillbilly would come in and snack on his men after
they had passed out on the floor. At first, our sympathies are with
Grendel (the mutant yokel from the sticks), because, hey, who doesn't
enjoy a Danish as a midnight treat? However, for the Danes, having
to leave the most glorious mead-hall ever built after just a couple
of rounds of Jägermeister is like owning a 72 inch plasma flatscreen
TV and only being able to watch PBS. It's not something to brag
about to the neighbors, anyway.
So, after 12 years of being man-chewed
by Grendel, Hrothgar is more than a little pessimistic when Beowulf
shows up and claims he can kill the guy. He offers Beowulf a near
gameshow list of prizes if he can exterminate Grendel. On the one
hand, Hrothgar figures if somehow, miraculously, Beowulf can succeed
it would be worth whatever it costs to get back to some serious
Viking-style drinking, and on the other hand, if he finds Beowulf's
remains half-eaten on the floor the next morning, then it wouldn't be
the first time he had to have his people clean up that sort of mess.
When Hrothgar goes to check on the results the next day, he is more
than a little surprised to see Beowulf standing gleefully naked while
waving Grendel's arm around like a boy scout learning semaphore.
Naturally, that night Hrothgar and
Beowulf party like it's 1399. Over dinner, Hrothgar rewards Beowulf
with an impressive stack of gifts, and Beowulf replies that he was
glad to lend a hand (or in this case, an entire arm from the shoulder
down). All of their company pass out in a glorious drunken stupor the
way God intended them to (or at least, according to the theology of
the anonymous Christian monk who first put the story to paper). When
they woke up the next day, however, everyone was deeply disappointed
to discover that nothing makes a hangover worse than the suddenly
recognition that you still have a monster problem. And that
realization – in a story about a guy who can hold his breath for
half a day while swimming underwater or who can hit a dragon in the
head so hard that it shatters his sword – is a truth that goes
beyond time itself: you're never really finished with a problem until
you've dealt with its mom.
Lesson #2: A good reputation is
better than a cave full of treasure. Although Beowulf had no
idea when he was tearing Grendel's arm off with his bare hands that
he would also have to go after Grendel's mother the next day, the
idea was not entirely unappealing. After all, Beowulf had not
traveled from Geatland (which is now a part of modern Sweden) to
merely return with a boatload of expensive rewards, he had gone with
the intention of making a name for himself. Killing a second monster
would only add to his renown. To Hrothgar, his men, and Beowulf's
crew, the second demonic fiend looked to be much more difficult to
kill than the first; whereas Grendel would come to them, Grendel's
Mother would have to be killed in her own cave, miles under the sea,
and thus, she had the home field advantage.
When it came time to leap into the
dark waters, Beowulf did not hesitate to take on the half day swim
underwater to go after Grendel's Mother because, after all, what's a
little thing like breathing when there's hero work to be done? After
fighting off a few other sea monsters on his way to the cave, Beowulf
finally located his second adversary standing next to an enormous
pile of treasure. He knew he was in the right place when he also
noticed Grendel's body on the floor lying next to the trove of
riches. The first sword Beowulf used against Grendel's Mother (lent
to him by a cowardly thane of Hrothgar who did not have the nerve to
go after her himself) turned out to be about as useful as wheels on a
rocking chair, and Grendel's Mother nearly killed him before he
figured that out. As fate would have it though, Beowulf spotted a
giant's sword mixed in with the treasure, and it turned out to be
just the thing for killing a big, ugly, angry sea-hag. Despite
Hollywood's assertion otherwise, Grendel's Mother was no Angelina
Jolie.
After killing Grendel's mom, Beowulf
decides he is not at all interested in any of the treasure that's
strewn about cave, and so he decides to cut off Grendel's head and
take that as a souvenir instead.
The acid in Grendel's blood dissolves
the blade of the giant sword, and thus, Beowulf is left holding a
huge, useless handle. By the time Beowulf gets back to the surface,
only his men were left waiting to see if he had survived; Hrothgar's
men gave up hours before. When Beowulf climbs out of the water
carrying Grendel's head and the heavy hilt that no one else can even
lift, no one bothers to ask why he left so much treasure behind in
order to come back with the creepy head of his enemy and a ruined
giant's sword. Beowulf didn't want the treasure because any treasure
he would have salvaged would have belonged to his king (who happened
to also be his uncle) back in Geatland, and because Beowulf had no
interest in wealth. As far as Beowulf was concerned, what matters
most in life is what people know about what you've done; having
possession of expensive, shiny stuff doesn't even factor into it.
Lesson #3: It's all good as long as
you haven't killed any family. In the third part of the story,
Beowulf returns home to Geatland and hands over his bounty to his
king and uncle, Hygelac. In turn, Hygelac gives Beowulf some good
stuff back, but it's really besides the point because Beowulf knows
he'll never have to pay for a drink again for the rest of his life.
Later after his uncle dies, Beowulf is offered the throne by his
aunt, Queen Hygd, but he declines because he knows it's not really
his right to become king (his cousin, Heardred was next in line).
Hygd wanted Beowulf to become king because she knew her own son,
Heardred, was too young and inexperienced to last very long as king.
She was right; before long, Heardred has died on a battlefield, and
Beowulf becomes king. Then, nothing happens for 50 years.
Presumably, Beowulf's half-century reign as king is uneventful
because no one wanted to battle with an army lead by Beowulf.
This leads then to the final epic
fight of the story between Beowulf and a fire-breathing 40 foot
lizard. Even though Beowulf had to be well into his 70s by the time
a dragon goes on a rampage and starts burning down random Geat
villages, Beowulf slaps on his old armor and heads out after the
beast. Beowulf takes a dozen of his best men with him, but when it
comes time to fight the dragon, all but one of them run away. At
this point, we learn that Beowulf has never had a son and his last
surviving relative, a thane named Wiglaf, is the only one of
Beowulf's crew willing to stand next to him as he fights his final
monster. The dragon takes a fatal knife to the belly, but only after
it has already delivered a terminal bite to Beowulf's neck.
As he is dying, Beowulf says to
Wiglaf, (and I'm paraphrasing, of course) “Don't worry about my
dying. It's all good. God will take me into Heaven because I always
kept my word, I never instigated a fight, and I never killed a family
member.” This, as much as anything, gives me hope. How awesome
would it be if, upon our own deaths, God held us to the same
standards Beowulf expected to face in the afterlife? I, for one,
would be much relieved to find out that bar we had to cross to reach
Heaven was pretty much being honest, not looking to start a fight,
and not killing any kinfolk. And now I've said that to my students
for the last time, I can only hope they can live up to it. God bless
us, one and all.
Keep thinking rhetorically, and I'll
be back next week.
Gosh… thank you for the post and for your compliments, Dr. D. Although I’m enjoying the flattery, I still think I’d go with “cave full of treasure” rather than “good reputation”—had I the choice. So although I’m with you on the first and last lessons, I dispute #2!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your post very much. And you needn’t issue disclaimers my way, by the way: I’ve spent the past couple of weeks extolling the virtues of anachronism to my students! (We’re studying medievalism, after all.) Indeed, _Beowulf_ itself is—if not anachronistic—nostalgic. The poem is out of time…
(Speaking of which, I love your line about Hrothgar and Beowulf partying like it’s 1399)
Are you familiar with J. R. R. Tolkien’s essay “_Beowulf_: The Monster and the Critics”? It’s based on a lecture he delivered in 1936—one year before _The Hobbit _was published. I think it’d be particularly interesting to a rhetorician like yourself: amongst other things, it’s a profound intervention in literary criticism. Beyond that, you’re a rhetorician at the rim—and Tolkien is analyzing what is properly peripheral and what is profound.
I initiated this response with a disputation (albeit in jest) regarding reputation and its relative value, so I’m going to conclude by restoring reputations and treasure troves. This was on JRRT’s agenda, too, in the aforementioned essay: he was interested in _Beowulf_’s reputation—the poem’s, mind you, not the eponymous hero’s—a volume of value, so to speak. And JRRT recognizes that _Beowulf_’s majesty is, in no small part, invested in its monsters. He writes, “A dragon is no idle fancy. Whatever may be his origins, in fact or invention, the dragon in legend is a potent creation of men’s imagination, richer in significance than his barrow is in gold.” A wonderful statement of value, no? Yet Tolkien exceeds himself at the end of the same passage: “There are in any case many heroes but very few good dragons.”
I read the Tolkien essay years ago when I was first prepping my Beowulf lectures. I still have it on PDF so I think I'll reread it this week.
DeleteSometime in the future I'd like your opinion on what the students' textbook says about Beowulf. It presents the poem as the product of centuries of oral retelling that an anonymous Christian monk co-opted in order to convert the pagans by subtly inserting Biblical references and expunging the older gods entirely. This is pretty much presented in the textbook without any disclaimer as "theory", just as historical fact. Anyway, I stopped using the anthology and now have the students read the Heaney translation.
Thanks for reading my blog this week. See you soon if the weather ever cooperates.