Polonius (upon seeing Hamlet engage
in a book): What do you read my lord? Hamlet: Words, words, words.
[Act 2, Scene 2]
About half an hour north from where I
live on my little ten acre homestead in rural Southeast Ohio, the
local community college used to host an annual fair and trade show
for foresters and lumberjacks. One of the regular features of this
expo was an ongoing demonstration of wood sculptures carved entirely
through the use of chainsaws. It was one of the displays that kept
folks coming back year after year. No matter how many times I
witnessed it firsthand, the intricacy of the detail that the carvers
could achieve with such large, heavy, awkward, and dangerous
equipment never failed to surprise and astonish. It wasn't magic,
but it seemed like it. It was almost something you would have to see
with your own eyes to believe: burly men swinging chainsaws with wild
precision attacking huge logs to whittle out beautiful works of art.
That artists can create beauty at all is a mystery worth careful
consideration; that such beauty can be made with raucous implements
that can devour human flesh as quickly as it can chew lumber moves
our contemplation from an appreciation of the sublime to an
admiration of the surreal.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but
I don't sling chainsaws; I sling words. Big fat clumsy words that are
just as dangerous in their own ways as chainsaws but without the risk
of immediate amputation.
A slip of a chainsaw can cause a
wood-carver to lose part of a foot, but a poorly reasoned idea can
wound a reputation for a lifetime. I don't really expect that
anything I write will be discussed in the distant future, but if any
of my views should somehow escape the black hole of obscurity from
which I compose, I would want them to be good ideas. I suppose that
is as much as any of us who write can ever hope for: a gratuitous
optimism that somehow our good ideas will linger awhile beyond our
mortal time frame and the bad ideas will rest with our bodies beneath
a solid six feet of dirt. Beyond my own little world of experience
and verbiage, I want the same to hold universally true for all
writers; regard it as my “rhetorical creed,” perhaps, but I want
to believe that good ideas that have been well articulated have a
Darwinian advantage over bad ideas that are poorly expressed.
Here's the deal – almost everyone of
us has had one of those rare moments when an excellent idea has
presented itself and then, while considering the prospect of the
enormity of the task of putting the idea into writing, has walked
away from the project because the climb to articulation seemed too
steep. Those of us who write (and teach writing) face the same
mountainous climb as Sisyphus when it comes to putting ideas into
comprehensible prose. The understanding that the words that end up
in our sentences will never fully live up to expressing our ideas can
produce a vertigo that prevents many people from writing altogether.
While chainsaws threaten to tear into skin and muscle, criticism of
our writing, especially the writing we care the most about, threatens
to rip into our souls. It's not just the effort to climb the
mountain where we reach the peak to where we have said what we needed
to say that intimidates us; it's the expectation that behind us,
holding on to our rope, is the deadweight of the internal critic who
wants to find fault with every verbal choice we make. Sometimes when
we are trying to write, it's as though we can hear that annoyed and
anxious climber behind us saying, “Be careful where you put that
comma or you could fall to your doom! Are you sure you want to use
that adverb there? It could mean something else to another reader,
and the next thing you know you're out fifty feet of good rope.”
Given the difficulty of saying things well with an interesting style
that nonetheless conforms to the dictates of Standard English, it is
a wonder that mere human beings strive at writing anything.
The question, then, is “How do we do
it? How can we carry our ideas up the steep mountain of composition
without getting overburdened from either the weight of our own
condemnation or the heavy criticism of others?” There is,
unfortunately, no single easy answer to this problem; there is no sky
lift that will hoist you effortlessly up to a finished composition.
There are, however, many solid techniques that struggling writers can
use for making the journey easier. The first, perhaps, is to stay
aware that writing is usually difficult for most people. Knowing
that writing is difficult doesn't excuse you from not doing it, but
it can help you get past the idea that it should be easier.
The second trick for developing
fluency in writing is to focus on where you are now instead of
continually reminding yourself of where you want to be. As an
alternative to feeling overwhelmed by the amount of distance you need
to cover to finish the project, think about how much easier it is to
merely write the next sentence or polish off the paragraph you're
working on. Instead of thinking in terms of “miles to go,” think
in terms of “steps ahead.” Slow progress builds momentum. Once
you get so far, writing often takes off on its own.
A third strategy for getting writing
done is to realize that everything and anything can be changed later
so it's better to just get things down poorly and revise later than
it is to attempt perfection on the first try. Perfection is
never going to happen; you can reach a point of deep satisfaction
with your prose without harboring the needless expectation you have
to love every word as it appears in your composition.
A fourth important tactic to keep
writing going is to see readers as co-travelers instead of as
audience members. A co-traveler is someone who goes along with you
for the journey, but an audience member is there to witness a
performance. While writing can be thought of as a performance, it
shouldn't be the point of your writing. When performance takes
precedence over message, the point of the journey (your message) can
get lost. Your concerns regarding other people's opinions on how well
you are climbing can overshadow your concern for completing the
journey. A co-traveler is there to help you find your way and to
enjoy your company; thinking about how best to accentuate your
reader's experience is a better alternative to feeling the weight of
worrying about responding to a critic's displeasure.
Finally, and perhaps the best trick
for making writing easier is to take yourself and your prose less
seriously. While writing is always going to carry the risk of
misinterpretation or offense to other people's sensibilities, you can
take comfort in the knowledge that you are almost certainly going to
care more about the inadequacies of your writing than other people
will. If you start up a mountain and realize this is not the scenery
you expected, then you've got the choice of plodding on ahead to see
where it takes you or starting afresh up a different mountain.
Sometimes, allowing the words to come out to see what they have to
tell you is completely worth the anxiety of not knowing what lies
beyond the turn up ahead.
If writing isn't your thing, I guess
there are always going to be chainsaws. On the other hand, if you
want to write on a Sunday morning, you are far less likely to disturb
the neighbors than if you were in the backyard knocking out your next
masterpiece with your 110 decibel Husqvarna. Keep thinking
rhetorically and I'll be back next week.
I really like the co-travelers concept! Thanks! I needed this word today with some serious writing ahead of me!
ReplyDeleteI appreciate the comments, Sue. I'm hoping some writing instructors might share this one with their students. Students take their writing struggles so personally that they don't often recognize that everyone struggles with writing.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the topic; it's great timing--your second point (among others) is a major personal hang-up. Presently, my writing projects appear to be penned by someone with a personality order jumbling genres and littering recycling bins. I think my career is more similar to the log-rolling competition, and I'm out there with a club-foot and inflatable giraffe ring. At this juncture, I wonder if I should cast aside other projects and (attempt to) simply focus?
ReplyDeleteI was whelped on the writings of Ed Abbey and Gary Snyder. Departing OU, I half-expected to be reporting in from the summit of Denali or tracking “lost” Amazonian tribes. Less-glamorous technical writing provides work, but tech firms don't appreciate when I try channeling my inner Tom Robbins. Abbey quipped “I'd rather be dead than not read at all.” Personally, I'd rather remain wed. As stifling as tech writing can be, I lack the confidence to move beyond the short story when on my own time. As much as I enjoy fiction, I don't feel like such originality is in me and self-doubt would derail me along the way. When you dig-in, Dr. Dudding, are you more of a plot/character gardener or architect? Also, I am curious as to your sense of conducive writing place as well as soliciting feedback from others in the writing process. Beyond the classroom, I've never reached out to any sort of community “workshop”—I expect I'd find a homogeneous pack of Daniel Steele diehards who suggest I consult a dermatologist when mentioning my TC Boyle.
Last I was going to ask about perspectives in fiction writing. I am comfortable with personal narratives in nature/environmental writing and general non-fiction. At the risk of being judged disingenuous or outright dishonest, third-person feels confidence-inspiring when navigating topics that I would otherwise neglect. I'm a health-conscious honey bugger who can manufacture meth; torture his parents and terrify little old ladies. Yet when imagining longer projects, my contempt for my own characters rules and dialogue feels either forced or phoney (no doubt solved be reading/writing more.) On the other hand, perhaps a misanthropic introvert should just skip character dialogue altogether.
Thanks again, Ryan, for your comments. I always enjoy reading what you have to say. As far as writing fiction, I like to start out thinking I know what's going to happen but letting what occurs unfold as though I really don't have much say about it. I've found a lot of caffeine can really help in that process.
DeleteI'm hoping that retirement will give me the time to see the progression/completion of several writing projects that has struggled to survive over the past few decades. Of course, once I have the time, I'll need to fight to find the motivation. It seems the Muse would rather play video games.